There is a
strong and inseparable connection between the highest authority in the
Administrative Order of the Faith i.e. the Guardianship, and the
Covenant of Baháulláh. The Covenant is the
channel from which authority is derived and flows through and passes on
by appointment. Abdul-Bahá is the Center of that
Covenant, and the Guardians have emerged from the Covenant of
Baháulláh.
Authority
of the Guardians:
The authority of the Guardians includes, but is not limited to
the right to interpret, to determine, command, control, adjudicate, and
to settle issues or disputes in the Faith or about the Faith. [Also,
there are other levels of authority in the Administrative Order of the
Faith, such as the different levels of the Houses of Justice which shall
not be discussed here]
Station:
This word
is used to distinguish spiritual status in the Faith (spiritual position
or rank). For example, a Hand of the Cause has a station while a member
of the Universal House of Justice does not. The station of
Baháulláh, the Báb, and
Abdul-Bahá is continued in the next world while the
station of the Guardians is limited to this world.
Relation
of authority to station:
Authority is an integral of station and they are
inseparable. To make it more clear, I give an example: If we look at a
chart of a business organization we will see some boxes which like a
pyramid is pointed at the top i.e., one box is at the top; in which is
written Chairman of the Board of Directors and a line downward connects
this box to another box which is written Board of Directors and from
this box several lines go to some boxes which represent the positions of
the high level directors and executives of the company and the
departments that they preside over and from each of these boxes some
downward lines are connected to the lower levels of management. Then in
the constitution of the company, for each position from top to bottom,
there is an explanation of the authority and duties for each position¬Ý
and an explanation as to the extent of supervision, command or taking of
orders etc. The authority is attached to the position as well as the
duties for anybody who occupies these positions. As soon as the person
leaves that position, authority will shift to and be exercised by the
next person who occupies their place, so the authority is attached to
the position and it is not attached to the person. It is the same way
with the station of the Guardianship. When a person becomes the Guardian
i.e., occupies the station of the Guardianship, he will be endowed with
the authority that the "Charter of the New World Order" describes.
Neither the authority nor the station of the Guardian has any
relationship to bloodline, race, nationality or language. "Acquired
infallibility is not a natural necessity."
Abdul-Bahá, Some Answered Questions, p. 171.
Infallibility and protection from error:
The fact that we must not
exaggerate about the station of the Guardians in no way means that we
should understate their exalted station. The Guardians are the sign of
God, the chosen branch, and interpreter of the Word of God and
recipients of the "ray of the bounty of infallibility which shines from
the Sun of Reality upon hearts, and grants a share and portion of itself
to souls. Although these souls have not essential infallibility, still
they are under the protection of God that is to say, God preserves
them from error." If we believe that Guardians are "under the care and
protection of the Abhá Beauty, under the shelter and unerring guidance
of the Exalted One" as the Master explains in his Will and Testament,
and recognize that they are receivers of divine guidance we must accept
that they will not make mistakes in matters which are related strictly
to the Cause and in interpretation of the teachings. To me "God
preserves them from error" clearly means they will not make errors. You
preserve food so that it will not deteriorate. We know that Guardians
are not infallible on subjects that are not related to the Cause and
about these subjects they are like other humans, but whatever they do or
say in regards to matters related to the Cause, since they are guided by
Baháulláh and the Báb, it is correct and
infallible, and it is the way that it should be at the time, of the
situation, condition or occasion, although it may seem to some of us as
not right.
There is
no one with authority to judge a Guardian:
It is questionable who has the
authority to judge a Guardian in regards to matters related to the
Cause; to say in this case or that case he made a mistake? We have seen
in T.R.B. some comments that Shoghi Effendi made a mistake because he
did not announce his successor more clearly than he did or that Mason
Remey made a mistake because he delayed making his proclamation or
similarly why did Joel B. Marangella wait so long to issue his
proclamation? My answer is: those things or similar things had to
happen. They were guided to do it the way they did. If Shoghi Effendi
trusted Rúhíyyih Khánum, he did not make a mistake as she was a Hand of
the Cause and also his secretary. Moreover, she was his wife, and all
of the records of her writings prior to the passing of the first
Guardian reveal to the reader her profound knowledge of the Faith and
the Covenant and emphasize her clear testimony to the necessity of the
continuation of the Guardianship until the end of the Baháí
Dispensation. If Rúhíyyih Khánum after the passing of Shoghi Effendi
followed the satanic promptings of her human soul,that was her great
error which made her the "Arch Covenant-breaker." The Guardians are not
prophets. Some people claim that the Manifestations of God have made a
lot of mistakes (which is not true), the fact is that we cannot judge
those things that have been done or have happened in the past according to today's knowledge and¬Ýunderstandings and conditions. We cannot blame
Jesus for what He did with the businesses in front of the Temple, which
by today's laws¬Ýwould be considered a crime. He did what He had to do
then according¬Ýto the Will of God. Some people have raised questions as
to why Shoghi Effendi put so many of his relatives out of the Faith. The
fact is that the condition of the Faith in its infancy required a
non-tolerant discipline and on the other hand those relatives'
exploitation and misuse of the privileges that they possessed was not
acceptable and they left no other choice for the Guardian. He did what
he had to do according to the Will of God.
The
Guardian must be obeyed:
We have to accept and obey the explanations and
interpretations of Abdul-Bahá and the Guardians, so
we have to believe in the explanation and interpretation of Shoghi
Effendi, about infallibility, when he says: "The infallibility of the
Guardian is confined to matters which are related strictly to the Cause
and interpretation of the teachings; he is not an infallible authority
on other subjects, such as economics, science, etc. When he feels that a
certain thing is essential for the protection of the Cause, even if it
is something that affects a person personally, he must be obeyed, but
when he gives advice, such as that he gave you in a previous letter
about your future, it is not binding; you are free to follow it or not
as you please." (Directives from the Guardian, p. 33)
The
hereditary principle:
To take hereditary principle in its biological
meaning is wrong; it is a system of succession of authority (king, ruler
etc.), which stands separate from the electoral system of choosing the
head of state, or the appointment of a council. In the hereditary
system the head of state chooses his successor, who may be a relative or
non-relative.
In the
Dispensation of Baha'u'llah, Shoghi Effendi mentions the law of
primogeniture to explain why, when Abdul-Bahá
appointed him, He wrote: "and after him will succeed the first-born of
his lineal descendants" (I think this was to emphasize the appointment
of Shoghi Effendi and to strengthen him against the opposition of his
half brothers) but in the next page of his sacred Will and Testament He
made this appointment conditional to being spiritually qualified and to
being appointed.
Great
violation:
Rúhíyyih Khánum neither looked to authority nor looked to
station. She did not want any more Guardians, as simple as that. I have
every reason to believe that she knew that Mason Remey was the
successor; for me it is hard to believe that Shoghi Effendi, when he was
very sick in London and knew that many people had died at this time from
the same epidemic of influenza, he had not discussed and disclosed to
her the way he had appointed his successor or dictated a last message to
the Baháí world. The book titled: "Ministry of the
Custodians" shows how she propagated and fabricated authority for the
Hands, the authority that they did not have and they could not have. She, after a lot of exaggeration about the Hands, mentions the
appointment of the first contingent of the Hands on 24 December 1951 and
continues in the same manner in explaining the appointments of the Hands
up to 1957. Then in a flashback she explains the establishment of the
International Baháí Council on 9 January 1951 only
in a few lines.
Denial of
IBC's status and authority
Rúhíyyih Khánum denied the status of the IBC and the
authority and station of its sacred head and considered only the
authority of those Hands who were the appointed members of the IBC.She
even lied that these five Hands were a separate body. Her statement
follows:
"In
addition to being members of the International Baháí
Council, these Hands, resident and serving at the World Centre,
constituted a separate body, specified by Shoghi Effendi to act as
liaison between him and the other Hands throughout the world, conveying
their messages to him and his to them, thus giving us, during his own
lifetime, a dual function as Hands directly serving under him and
officers of the International Baháí Council. I
believe that at that particularly dangerous juncture in
Baháí history this duality was providential and
greatly reinforced the authority and power of the Custodians when faced
by the crisis of his sudden passing." Ministry of the Custodians, p.5
The
Ministry of the Custodians is a collection of proofs of dishonesty and
deceit of Rúhíyyih Khánum and the Hands who followed her.
In regards
to those who continued to follow Mason Remey after his mental
deterioration and after he had abdicated the Guardianship, or in other
words, after he had vacated his station and passed on the authority
which was endowed with the station of the Guardianship, they focused on
his personage without caring that due to his mental condition he
was now contradicting in his statements, the Will and Testament and
deprecating Shoghi Effendi and even what he himself had said and written
in his early writings as Guardian.
The
present bogus administration practically supposes that Shoghi Effendi
made a mistake in not appointing his successor or in not stating there
would be no more Guardians.
In the
Ministry of Custodians and in the writings of the bogus UHJ, you can see
a lot of references to the passing of the first Guardian and to the
things that happened as a great test in the Faith, which also we believe
was a great test. But how is it a test and what will be tested when the
test is to check if those being tested have acquired the necessary
knowledge, prior to this test, to realize that its solution would be
found in the sacred provisions of the Will and Testament and in the
writings and messages of Shoghi Effendi, especially in his proclamation
of 9 January 1951?
Nosrat'u'llah Bahremand
Hand of
the Cause of God